Editor's Note
This short piece by Col Shivaji Ranjan Ghosh on a relevant subject would surely be appreciated by viewers of our electronic media in India . It pertains to subjects pertaining to national security and military matters and covers defence ,strategy ,PME , leadership, selection, training, promotions,etc.
The programs are primarily focused on Indian Armed Forces and national security against the backdrop of regional security and happenings around the globe.
The author makes a strong contention when he raises doubts about the self-styled , self -nominated defence experts that are selected / nominated / picked up by various TV channels and other agencies that run these shows/ interviews to project certain views , perceptions, and opinions that are generally not authentic or professional and far from the truth that misinform and mislead ignorant and less informed viewers .
The author strongly advocates that this should stop, and a regulation be brought into force by the government or their nominated defence advisers / experts to prevent this from continuing in this manner . This would surely help in projecting the correct and authentic views and facts on various subjects and linked issues that are frequently covered, especially by the national /state level TV channels and private agencies that run these programs.
Editor ,MVI
Note - The pictures 📸 are only symbolic in nature and do not represent any character mentioned in the article . - MVI
Of late, veterans have been publicly highlighting very important issues including such diverse topics as Agniveers, the Russia-Ukraine War, the Gaza-Palestine situation, the Military-vs-Police relationship, the Defence Budget and so on. This article is to highlight another aspect that has been staring us in the face for a very long time and needs to be discussed. The Veteran, or more precisely, the “Defence Expert”, the ubiquitous angry old man who appears on prime-time television every night to share his insight into all matters military! Because, after all, to the common man, and to the panel on TV debates, the “gentleman” sitting there with a flowing moustache, the side-cap and, of late, a Modi
jacket (earlier known as a Nehru jacket) represents the Indian Armed Forces and the veterans’community.
That being so, it is time to ask ourselves a simple question. Are we to be represented by these non descript lot who claim to be the fountainheads of military wisdom? Some, a very few actually, do have the intellect and the etiquettes to be the torch-bearers of the military veterans, but a vast majority are nothing short of buffoons who have reduced the veteran’s stature to that of a caricature.
Let us start with their dress. Why on earth do they have to wear a side-cap when they appear on television? This started off with simply a Regimental cap, then someone added his regimental badge, then another added the badges of other units served in, like Rashtriya Rifles, Special Frontier Force etc. Next, inevitably, came the stars, one, two or three depending on the retiring rank, thus basically transferring the star plates from their cars to their caps. Then, with space running out on their caps, they shifted their focus to their jackets, and soon enough we saw the ridiculous sight of medals, ribbons, name tabs, commendation badges, parachute wings, missiles, diver’s badges, flyer’s wings etc emblazoned on the jackets. What happened to the dress code for veterans? More important, what happened to the moral code for veterans?
Next issue is their behaviour. We have had several instances where the Defence Expert has resorted to the use of foul language that would have got him kicked out of the hallowed precincts of any self respecting Officers’ Mess. Shouting at fellow panellists, gesturing wildly, openly taking sides with political parties has become a norm. A far cry, indeed, from the image of “an Officer and a Gentleman”.
We may derisively refer to the IAS cadre as “Babus”, but we can certainly learn a thing or two on the subject of dignified behaviour from their panellists. As regards their knowledge of the subject matter under discussion, the lesser said the better. An officer who served as a Lieutenant in J&K becomes a Kashmir Expert. An officer who would have been a junior functionary in an administrative installation in Leh would become a Kargil War Veteran. And for all these venerable gentlemen, a little homework with Google would provide them with the knowledge to impress those who know even less. And unfortunately, these handful of people become the public face of the veterans. The situation can be summed up by paraphrasing Sir Winston Churchill’s immortal words and stating “Never before in the history of the Armed Forces has so much
damage been done to so many by so few”.
It is high time to rein in these people. The Army HQ must lay down and enforce a code of conduct for veterans who appear on public platforms. No military insignia should be allowed , and no instances of ungentlemanly conduct should be tolerated. We have lived a dignified life while we were in service.
Let not a small bunch of self-seekers destroy that image.
When anyone can start a Youtube channel on anything for reaching out to an audience at large - the thought/idea of regulating some veterans coming on news channels seems somewhat absurd. There is nothing to stop any veteran from starting a Youtube channel and many have done.Some are writing blogs- so where is this proposed superintendence supposed to end ?
Let the viewer decide whether one finds the analysis given by the veteran worth considering or not.
As it is our so
called PROs are rarely or never seen on any media giving their views on any issue, no matter how important the matter may be.
I doubt the Govt will take any cogniscance of this so called proposal for…
I have a feeling that the veteran author despises a few well known defence experts on electronic media, either owing to certain long nurtured professional grudge or maybe because of different political leaning. Else, derogatory remarks wouldn't have been made by the author for those veterans. Secondly, post superannuation, none of the veteran is governed by the Army Act, 1950, and therefore expecting AHQ to regulate the attire, attitude and wisdom of a veteran is certainly a "no go" ab-initio. Thirdly, what's wrong in wearing a side cap? Or a jacket? Both look pretty elegant and provide a regal look to the wearer. Yes, about service medals, I agree, that all should abide by the officially prescribed method of wearing…